CareLit · DOI-Nachweis · Klinische Neurophysiologie
Spontaneous saccadic eye movements are slower than saccades to other imagined stimuli – and even slower than REMs
DOI 10.1055/s-0030-1250916
Bibliografische Angaben
Nachweis in CareLit
Autor:innenA Sprenger, M Lappe-Osthege, S Talamo, S Gais, H Kimmig, C Helmchen
ZeitschriftKlinische Neurophysiologie
Ausgabe03/2010
Jahrgang / SeitenNicht angegeben
Kernaussage aus der Literatur
Abstract-Vorschau
There is a controversial debate whether rapid eye movements in sleep (REMs) are meaningful (functional) saccades or are due to spontaneous eye muscle contractions. We therefore compared saccadic eye movements with closed eyes to previously seen visual stimuli (dots, static images, videos), auditory stimuli, during math calculations and spontaneous saccades to REMs. In trials with visual stimuli subjects were asked t…
Zitieren
Zitierempfehlung
A Sprenger, M Lappe-Osthege, S Talamo, S Gais, H Kimmig, C Helmchen (2010) Spontaneous saccadic eye movements are slower than saccades to other imagined stimuli – and even slower than REMs. Klinische Neurophysiologie (03). https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0030-1250916
Mit CareLit weiterarbeiten