CareLit · DOI-Nachweis · Klinische Pädiatrie
Nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure for neonatal respiratory failure: a prospective, randomized, controlled study
DOI 10.1055/s-0030-1261316
Bibliografische Angaben
Nachweis in CareLit
Autor:innenY Shi, S Tang, J Shen, H Li
ZeitschriftKlinische Pädiatrie
Ausgabe06/2010
Jahrgang / SeitenNicht angegeben
Kernaussage aus der Literatur
Abstract-Vorschau
Objective To evaluate whether nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) compared with nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) would decrease the requirement for endotracheal ventilation in the treatment of respiratory failure in preterm and term infants. Methods Prospective, randomized, controlled, single-center study. 101 neonatal infants were randomized into NIPPV group (n=48) and nCPAP gr…
Zitieren
Zitierempfehlung
Y Shi, S Tang, J Shen, H Li (2010) Nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure for neonatal respiratory failure: a prospective, randomized, controlled study. Klinische Pädiatrie (06). https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0030-1261316
Mit CareLit weiterarbeiten