CareLit · DOI-Nachweis · Zeitschrift für Gastroenterologie
Comparison of adhesion prevention efficacy of coated Parietex® and Proceed® meshes versus uncoated polypropylene mesh combined with anti-adhesion device 4DryField® PH in a new IPOM rat model with impaired intestinal peritoneum
DOI 10.1055/s-0036-1586907
Bibliografische Angaben
Nachweis in CareLit
Autor:innenD Pöhnert, LV Grethe, L Mägel, J Klempnauer, M Winny
ZeitschriftZeitschrift für Gastroenterologie
Ausgabe08/2016
Jahrgang / SeitenNicht angegeben
Kernaussage aus der Literatur
Abstract-Vorschau
Introduction: Intestinal adhesions to IPOM meshes are a problem following hernia surgery. In areas where the hernia sac content has been dissolved from the hernia wall, an intact peritoneal coverage is missing and is a location at risk for intestine to IPOM adhesions. Using a new IPOM rat model the role of missing intact peritoneal coverage in the development of intestine to mesh adhesions was investigated. The adhe…
Zitieren
Zitierempfehlung
D Pöhnert, LV Grethe, L Mägel, J Klempnauer, M Winny (2016) Comparison of adhesion prevention efficacy of coated Parietex® and Proceed® meshes versus uncoated polypropylene mesh combined with anti-adhesion device 4DryField® PH in a new IPOM rat model with impaired intestinal peritoneum. Zeitschrift für Gastroenterologie (08). https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0036-1586907
Mit CareLit weiterarbeiten