CareLit · DOI-Nachweis · Aktuelle Ernährungsmedizin
MEDPass versus conventional administration of Oral Nutritional Supplements – a randomized controlled trial comparing coverage of energy and protein requirements
DOI 10.1055/s-0043-1768112
Bibliografische Angaben
Nachweis in CareLit
Autor:innenKurmann, S.; Reber, E.; Schönenberger, K.A.; Schuetz, P.; Uhlmann, K.; Vasiloglou, M.F.; Schoenenberger, A.W.; Bertschi, C.; Sterchi, A.; Stanga, Z.
ZeitschriftAktuelle Ernährungsmedizin
Ausgabe3/2023
Jahrgang / SeitenJg. 19 · S. 1 bis 1
Kernaussage aus der Literatur
Abstract-Vorschau
Introduction Oral nutritional supplements (ONS) are used to reach protein and energy goals in patients at risk of malnutrition [1]. Compliance with ONS can be challenging but may be improved by prescribing ONS in smaller portions with medication rounds (MEDPass) [2]. We compared the likelihood of meeting energy and protein requirements in patients receiving ONS with MEDPass versus conventional administration. Materi…
Zitieren
Zitierempfehlung
Kurmann, S.; Reber, E.; Schönenberger, K.A.; Schuetz, P.; Uhlmann, K.; Vasiloglou, M.F.; Schoenenberger, A.W.; Bertschi, C.; Sterchi, A.; Stanga, Z (2023) MEDPass versus conventional administration of Oral Nutritional Supplements – a randomized controlled trial comparing coverage of energy and protein requirements. Aktuelle Ernährungsmedizin, 19 (3), 1 bis 1. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1768112
Mit CareLit weiterarbeiten