CareLit · DOI-Nachweis · physioscience
Comparative efficacy and safety of digital and hybrid interventions for the treatment of low back pain: systematic review and Bayesian component network meta-analysis
DOI 10.1055/s-0045-1811294
Bibliografische Angaben
Nachweis in CareLit
Autor:innenKaczorowski, S.; Donath, L.; Owen, P.J.; Arora, N.K.; Saueressig, T.; Pedder, H.; Mundell, N.L.; Schleimer, T.; Döding, R.; Belavy, D.L.
Zeitschriftphysioscience
AusgabeS 02/2025
Jahrgang / SeitenJg. 21 · S. 1 bis 1
Kernaussage aus der Literatur
Abstract-Vorschau
Introduction Digital interventions for low back pain (LBP) often combine exercise training, education, and psychological components, delivered either fully digitally or as hybrid models incorporating in-person elements. It is unclear which components and combinations of these drive clinical efficacy. Utilizing a prospectively registered component network meta-analysis (CNMA) we evaluated the efficacy and safety of d…
Zitieren
Zitierempfehlung
Kaczorowski, S.; Donath, L.; Owen, P.J.; Arora, N.K.; Saueressig, T.; Pedder, H.; Mundell, N.L.; Schleimer, T.; Döding, R.; Belavy, D.L (2025) Comparative efficacy and safety of digital and hybrid interventions for the treatment of low back pain: systematic review and Bayesian component network meta-analysis. physioscience, 21 (S 02), 1 bis 1. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0045-1811294
Mit CareLit weiterarbeiten