Gesundheitsökonomie & Qualitätsmanagement , Thieme Verlag Heft 3-2009, Jahrgang 14) ISSN 1432-2625 Seite(n) 132 bis 143 DOI: 10.1055/s-2008-1027815 CareLit-Dokument-Nr: 318600 |
|
Zusammenfassung In den Vereinigten Staaten von Amerika ist seit 2004 die Veröffentlichung von Leistungsdaten für Krankenhäuser Voraussetzung für die Kostenerstattung durch die staatliche Krankenversicherung für 65-Jährige (Medicare) und Kostenerstattung für Krankenhäuser auf Leistungsbasis ist ab 2009 fest vorgesehen. Der Artikel erläutert das regulative Framework und diskutiert das erste größere Pilotprojekt für Kostenerstattung auf Leistungsbasis für Krankenhäuser, das CMS Premier Hospital Quality Incentive (HQI) Programm. Der Artikel widmet sich dann einer kritischen Diskussion des vorgeschlagenen Modells für Kostenerstattung auf Leistungsbasis für Krankenhäuser, das 2009 für landesweite Einführung vorgesehen ist. Abstract In the United States pay for reporting for hospitals has been well established since 2004 and the Center for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) has committed to Pay for Performance by the fiscal year of 2009. The article outlines the regulatory environment including legislation passed by the US congress and explains the methodology and provides a critical discussion of the first major pay for performance pilot project for hospitals in the United States, the CMS Premier Hospital Quality Incentive (HQI) Demonstration. The article then focuses on CMS’ proposed methodology for the implementation of pay for performance for hospitals by 2009 and critically assesses challenges and opportunities. Schlüsselwörter Qualität - Vergütung für Krankenhäuser - Indikatoren Key words Quality of Case Reimbursement - Incentive Quality Indicators - Health Care Literatur 1 Anderson G F, Frogner B K, Johns R A. et al . Health care spending and use of information technology in OECD countries. Health Aff (Millwood). 2006; 25 (3) 819-831 Google Scholar 2 Anderson G F, Hussey P S, Frogner B K. et al . Health spending in the United States and the rest of the industrialized world. Health Aff (Millwood). 2005; 24 (4) 903-914 Google Scholar 3 Medicare & You 2008. Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services. 2008; , http://www.medicare.gov/Publications/Pubs/pdf/10050.pdf; Stand: 18.9.2008 Google Scholar 4 Statement of Work. Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services. 2007; , http://www.cms.hhs.gov/QualityImprovementOrgs/ 04_9thsow.asp.; Stand 11.7.2007 Google Scholar 5 CMS Inpatient Resource Listing for Providers & Other Organizations. 2003; , http://www.qnetexchange.org/public/newcart/docs/ms/inpt_resource_list.doc.; Stand 30.3.2007 Google Scholar 6 Braun B I, Koss R G, Loeb J M. Integrating performance measure data into the Joint Commission accreditation process. Eval Health Prof. 1999; 22 (3) 283-297 Google Scholar 7 Hanold L S, Koss R G, Loeb J M. The ORYX initiative: goals and potential application to physician quality improvement efforts. Tex Med. 2000; 96 (10) 84-87 Google Scholar 8 Maleyeff J, Kaminsky F C, Jubinville A. et al . A guide to using performance measurement systems for continuous improvement. J Healthc Qual. 2001; 23 (4) 33-37 Google Scholar 9 Matthes N, Wiest A. Die Qualität der Krankenhausversorung – eine messbare Größe?. Arnold M, Litsch M, Schellschmidt H Krankenhausreport 2000 Stuttgart, New York; Schattauer 2001: 333-348 Google Scholar 10 Lee K, McGreevey C. Using control charts to assess performance measurement data. Jt Comm J Qual Improv. 2002; 28 (2) 90-101 Google Scholar 11 Lee K Y, McGreevey C. Using comparison charts to assess performance measurement data. Jt Comm J Qual Improv. 2002; 28 (3) 129-138 Google Scholar 12 Spath P. Present comparative data effectively. Hosp Peer Rev. 2001; 26 (3) 34, 9-40 Google Scholar 13 The 2006 JCAHO Accreditation Contract: Update on Unresolved Issues. American Hospital Association. 2005; , http://www.aha.org/aha/advisory/ 2005 / 051 102-quality-adv.pdf.; Stand 12.7.2007 Google Scholar 14 Dear Colleague. The Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations. 2006; , http://www.jointcommission.org/NR/rdonlyres/C197A447-C09E-44E6 – 9514-F3B5D7D6AFA4 / 0 / 11_27_06.pdf.; Stand 12.7.2007 Google Scholar 15 US Congress. Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act of 2003. , http://www.cms.hhs.gov/EmplUnionPlanSponsorInfo/downloads/hr1.pdf; Stand 18.9.2008 Google Scholar 16 Hospital Compare – A quality tool for adults, including people with Medicare. United States Department of Health and Human Services. 2007; , http://www.hospitalcompare.hhs.gov/Hospital/Search/SearchCriteria.asp?version=default&browser=Firefox% 7C2 % 7CWinXP&language=English&defaultstatus= 0&pagelist=Home.; Stand 12.7.2007 Google Scholar 17 US Congress. Deficit Reduction Act. of 2005. Section 5001 Hospital Quality Improvement. , http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/F?c109:5:./temp/~c109ESN3pE:e74482; Stand 18.9.2008 Google Scholar 18 Reporting Hospital Quality Data for Annual Payment Update. Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services. 2007; , http://www.cms.hhs.gov/HospitalQualityInits/ 20_HospitalRHQDAPU.asp., Stand 12.7.2007 Google Scholar 19 Hospital CAHPS®. Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services. 2007; , http://www.cms.hhs.gov/HospitalQualityInits/downloads/HospitalSurvey2.pdf.; Stand 13.7.2007 Google Scholar 20 HCAHPS: Patient Perspectives on Care. Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services. 2007; , http://www.cms.hhs.gov/HospitalQualityInits/ 30_HospitalHCAHPS.asp.; Stand 13.7.2007 Google Scholar 21 CAHPS® Hospital Survey Training Update Training May 2007. Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services. 2007; , http://www.hcahpsonline.org/files/FINAL-complete% 20May% 202 007 % 20Update% 20Training% 20slides% 205 – 09 – 2007.pdf.; Stand 13.7.2007 Google Scholar 22 HCAHPS Three-State Pilot Study Analysis Results. Washington; The CAHPS® II Investigators and The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality 2003 Google Scholar 23 Premier Hospital Quality Incentive Demonstration Project: Project Findings from Year 2. Premier. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. 2007; , http://www.premierinc.com/quality-safety/tools-services/p4p/hqi/resources/hqi-whitepaper-year2.pdf.; Stand 4.7.2007 Google Scholar 24 CMS HQI Demonstration Project: Composite Score Methodology Overview. CMS. 2004; , http://www.cms.hhs.gov/HospitalQualityInits/downloads/HospitalCompositeQualityScoreMethodologyOverview.pdf.; Stand 4.7.2007 Google Scholar 25 Glickman S W, Ou F S, DeLong E R. et al . Pay for performance, quality of care, and outcomes in acute myocardial infarction. Jama. 2007; 297 (21) 2373-2380 Google Scholar 26 Jha A K, Li Z, Orav E J. et al . Care in U. S. hospitals -the Hospital Quality Alliance program. N Engl J Med. 2005; 353 (3) 265-274 Google Scholar 27 Details for: FY 2008 Inpatient Prospective Payment System Proposed Rule Improving the Quality of Hospital Care. CMS Office of Public Affairs. 2007; , http://www.cms.hhs.gov/apps/media/press/factsheet.asp?Counter= 2119&intNumPerPage= 10&checkDate=&checkKey=&srchType= 1&numDays= 3500&srchOpt= 0&srchData=&keywordType=All&chkNewsType= 6&intPage=&showAll=&pYear=&year=&desc=&cboOrder=date.; Stand 3.7.2007 Google Scholar 28 Medicare Hospital Value-Based Purchasing Options Paper. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. 2007; , http://www.cms.hhs.gov/AcuteInpatientPPS/downloads/HospitalVBPOptions.pdf; Stand 28.8.2008 Google Scholar 29 Matthes N W. Veröffentlichung von Qualitätsdaten für Krankenhäuser in den USA. Schellscmidt, H Krankenhausreport 2004 Stuttgart; Schattauer 2004: 49-74 Google Scholar 30 Marshall M N, Shekelle P G, Leatherman S. et al . The public release of performance data: what do we expect to gain? A review of the evidence. Jama. 2000; 283 (14) 1866-1874 Google Scholar 31 Werner R M, Asch D A. The unintended consequences of publicly reporting quality information. JAMA. 2005; 293 (10) 1239-1244 Google Scholar 32 Hannan E L, Chassin M R. Publicly reporting quality information. JAMA. 2005; 293 (24) 2999-3000 [author reply] Google Scholar 33 Hibbard J H, Stockard J, Tusler M. Does publicizing hospital performance stimulate quality improvement efforts?. Health Aff (Millwood). 2003; 22 (2) 84-94 Google Scholar 34 Donabedian A. Evaluating the quality of medical care. Milbank Mem Fund Q. 1966; 44 (3) Suppl 66-206 Google Scholar 35 Donabedian A. The quality of medical care: methods for assessing and monitoring the quality of care for research and for quality assurance programs. Science. 1972; 200 (26) 856-864 Google Scholar 36 Donabedian A. Explorations in Quality Assessment and Monitoring: The Definition of Quality and Approaches to Its Assessment. Vol. III. The Methods and Findings of Quality Assessment Measurement and Monitoring. Ann Arbor, MI: Health Administration Press 1985 Google Scholar 37 Donabedian A. The role of outcomes in quality assessment and assurance. QRB Qual Rev Bull. 1992; 18 (11) 356-360 Google Scholar 38 Pronovost P J, Jenckes M W, Dorman T. et al . Organizational characteristics of intensive care units related to outcomes of abdominal aortic surgery. Jama. 1999; 281 (14) 1310-1317 Google Scholar 39 Rapoport J, Teres D, Steingrub J. et al . Patient characteristics and ICU organizational factors that influence frequency of pulmonary artery catheterization. Jama. 2000; 283 (19) 2559-2567 Google Scholar 40 Dimick J B, Pronovost P J, Heitmiller R F. et al . Intensive care unit physician staffing is associated with decreased length of stay, hospital cost, and complications after esophageal resection. Crit Care Med. 2001; 29 (4) 753-758 Google Scholar 41 Fuchs R J, Berenholtz S M, Dorman T. Do intensivists in ICU improve outcome?. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2005; 19 (1) 125-135 Google Scholar 42 Pronovost P J, Needham D M, Waters H. et al . Intensive care unit physician staffing: financial modeling of the Leapfrog standard. Crit Care Med. 2004; 32 (6) 1247-1253 Google Scholar 43 The Leapfrog Group Fact Sheet. The Leapfrog Group. 2007; , http://www.leapfroggroup.org/media/file/leapfrog_factsheet.pdf.; Stand 13.7.2007 Google Scholar 44 Kilbridge P M, Welebob E M, Classen D C. Development of the Leapfrog methodology for evaluating hospital implemented inpatient computerized physician order entry systems. Qual Saf Health Care. 2006; 15 (2) 81-84 Google Scholar 45 Usage of CPOE steadily increasing, leapfrog says. Healthcare Benchmarks Qual Improv. 2006; 13 (3) 33-34 Google Scholar 46 Hillman J M, Given R S. Hospital implementation of computerized provider order entry systems: results from the 2003 leapfrog group quality and safety survey. J Healthc Inf Manag. 2005; 19 (4) 55-65 Google Scholar 47 Meadows G, Chaiken B P. Computerized physician order entry: a prescription for patient safety. Nurs Econ. 2002; 20 (2) 76 – 77,-87 Google Scholar 48 Doolan D F, Bates D W. Computerized physician order entry systems in hospitals: mandates and incentives. Health Aff (Millwood). 2002; 21 (4) 180-188 Google Scholar 49 Pronovost P, Thompson D A, Holzmueller C G. et al . Impact of the Leapfrog Group’s intensive care unit physician staffing standard. J Crit Care. 2007; 22 (2) 89-96 Google Scholar 50 Kahn J M, Matthews F A, Angus D C. et al . Barriers to implementing the Leapfrog Group recommendations for intensivist physician staffing: a survey of intensive care unit directors. J Crit Care. 2007; 22 (2) 97-103 Google Scholar 51 Angus D C, Shorr A F, White A. et al . Critical care delivery in the United States: distribution of services and compliance with Leapfrog recommendations. Crit Care Med. 2006; 34 (4) 1016-1024 Google Scholar 52 Pronovost P J, Waters H, Dorman T. Impact of critical care physician workforce for intensive care unit physician staffing. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2001; 7 (6) 456-459 Google Scholar 53 Young M P, Birkmeyer J D. Potential reduction in mortality rates using an intensivist model to manage intensive care units. Eff Clin Pract. 2000; 3 (6) 284-289 Google Scholar 54 Groups join call for CMS to drop IPPS cuts. American Hospital Association. 2007; , http://www.ahanews.com/ahanews_app/jsp/display.jsp?dcrpath=AHANEWS/AHANewsNowArticle/data/ann_070 717_IPPS&domain=AHANEWS.; Stand 17.7.2007 Google Scholar 55 Remarks of acting administrator Leslie V. Norwalk. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. 2006; , http://www.cms.hhs.gov/apps/media/press/speech.asp?Counter= 2055&intNumPerPage= 10&checkDate=&checkKey=&srchType=&numDays= 3500&srchOpt= 0&srchData=&keywordType=All&chkNewsType= 11&intPage=&showAll=&pYear=&year=&desc=&cboOrder=date.; Stand 17.7.2007 Google Scholar 56 Lindenauer P K, Remus D, Roman S. et al . Public reporting and pay for performance in hospital quality improvement. N Engl J Med. 2007; 356 (5) 486-496 Google Scholar 3 Für klinische Gebiete mit Ergebnisindikatoren kann der Höchstwert etwas von 100 abweichen, da die Quotienten keinen absoluten Höchstwert besitzen. Assistant Professor (adj.) Nikolas Matthes Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Department of Health Policy and Management 624 N. Broadway, Baltimore MD 21205, USA Email: nmatthes@jhsph.edu
{{detailinfo.data.api.data.document[0].apa}}
{{detailinfo.data.api.data.document[0].vancouver}}
{{detailinfo.data.api.data.document[0].harvard}}