Neu: CareLit 5.0 testen

Zusammenfassung

     Abstract Cochlear implants (CIs) can provide access to music despite profound hearing loss. Yet the quality of music experience with CIs remains heterogeneous. The perception of basic musical features and more complex processing steps can be investigated using EEG, for example by relying on the mismatch paradigm and semantic priming. Future research and rehabilitation should shift in focus to the individual musical experience of CI users under everyday listening conditions. Bei hochgradigem Hörverlust kann ein Kochleaimplantat (Cochlear Implant, CI) den Zugang zu Musik ermöglichen. Die Qualität des CI-gestützten Musikerlebens ist jedoch sehr unterschiedlich. Mittels Elektroenzephalografie (EEG) lassen sich die Wahrnehmung musikalischer Grundelemente und komplexere Verarbeitungsschritte untersuchen, z. B. mit dem Mismatch-Paradigma und dem semantischen Priming. Schlüsselwörter Musik - Kochleaimplantat - Cochlear Implant - CI - Elektroenzephalografie - EEG - N400 - Mismatch-Response - MMR Key Words Music - cochlear implant - CI - EEG - N400 - mismatch response - MMR 11 March 2024 © 2024. Thieme. All rights reserved. Georg Thieme Verlag KG Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany Literatur 1 Peretz I. Towards a neurobiology of musical emotions. Juslin PN, Sloboda JA. Handbook of music and emotion: Theory, research, applications. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2010 Google Scholar 2 Dritsakis G, van Besouw RM, O’Meara A. Impact of music on the quality of life of cochlear implant users: a focus group study. Cochlear Implants Int 2017; 18: 207-215 DOI: 10.1080/14670100.2017.1303892. Google Scholar 3 Kohlberg G, Spitzer JB, Mancuso D. et al. Does cochlear implantation restore music appreciation?. Laryngoscope 2014; 124: 587-588 DOI: 10.1002/lary.24171. Google Scholar 4 Gfeller K, Driscoll V, Schwalje A. Adult Cochlear Implant Recipients’ Perspectives on Experiences With Music in Everyday Life: A Multifaceted and Dynamic Phenomenon. Front Neurosci 2019; 13 DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2019.01229. Google Scholar 5 Limb CJ, Roy AT. Technological, biological, and acoustical constraints to music perception in cochlear implant users. Hear Res 2014; 308: 13-26 Google Scholar 6 Gfeller K, Oleson J, Knutson JF. et al. Multivariate Predictors of Music Perception and Appraisal by Adult Cochlear Implant Users. J Am Acad Audiol 2008; 19: 120-134 DOI: 10.3766/jaaa.19.2.3.Multivariate. Google Scholar 7 Krumhansl CL. Rhythm and pitch in music cognition. Psychol Bull 2000; 126: 159-179 Google Scholar 8 Jiam NT, Caldwell MT, Limb CJ. What Does Music Sound Like for a Cochlear Implant User?. Otol Neurotol 2017; 38: e240-e247 DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000001448. Google Scholar 9 Sharp A, Delcenserie A, Champoux F. Auditory event-related potentials associated with music perception in cochlear implant users. Front Neurosci 2018; 12: 1-8 DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2018.00538. Google Scholar 10 Hahne A, Mainka A, Leuner A. et al. Adult cochlear implant users are able to discriminate basic tonal features in musical patterns: Evidence from event-related potentials. Otol Neurotol 2016; 37: e360-e368 DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000001067. Google Scholar 11 Seeberg AB, Haumann NT, Højlund A. et al. Adapting to the Sound of Music – Development of Music Discrimination Skills in Recently Implanted CI Users. Trends Hear 2023; 27 DOI: 10.1177/23312165221148035. Google Scholar 12 Haumann NT, Petersen B, Friis Andersen AS. et al. Mismatch negativity as a marker of music perception in individual cochlear implant users: A spike density component analysis study. Clin Neurophysiol 2023; 148: 76-92 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2023.01.015. Google Scholar 13 Prevoteau C, Chen SY, Lalwani AK. Music enjoyment with cochlear implantation. Auris Nasus Larynx 2018; 45: 895-902 DOI: 10.1016/j.anl.2017.11.008. Google Scholar 14 Bruns L, Mürbe D, Hahne A. Understanding music with cochlear implants. Sci Rep 2016; 6: 1-14 DOI: 10.1038/srep32026. Google Scholar 15 Koelsch S, Kasper E, Sammler D. et al. Music, language and meaning: Brain signatures of semantic processing. Nat Neurosci 2004; 7: 302-307 DOI: 10.1038/nn1197. Google Scholar 16 Riley PE, Ruhl DS, Camacho M. et al. Music Appreciation after Cochlear Implantation in Adult Patients: A Systematic Review. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2018; 158: 1002-1010 DOI: 10.1177/0194599818760559. Google Scholar 17 Fowler SL, Calhoun H, Warner-Czyz AD. Music perception and speech-in-noise skills of typical hearing and cochlear implant listeners. Am J Audiol 2021; 30: 170-181 DOI: 10.1044/2020_AJA-20-00116. Google Scholar 18 Nogueira W, Nagathil A, Martin R. Making Music More Accessible. IEEE Signal Process Mag 2019; 36: 115-127 DOI: 10.1109/MSP.2018.2874059. Google Scholar 19 DGHNO-KHC. Weißbuch Cochlea-Implantat (CI)-Versorgung. Deutsche Gesellschaft für Hals-Nasen-Ohren-Heilkunde, Kopf- und Hals-Chirurgie e.V. 2021 Google Scholar

Vorschau