CareLit Fachartikel

Mifepristone versus intracervical prostaglandin E2 gel for cervical ripening and labor induction

O Baev, V Rumyantseva · Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde · 2011 · Heft 11

Dokument
1017092
CareLit-ID
Jahr
2011
Publikation
PDF
nein
Metadaten
DOI
ja
zitierfähig

Bibliografische Angaben

Zeitschrift
Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde
Autor:innen
O Baev, V Rumyantseva
Ausgabe
Heft 11 / 2011
Seiten
–
Erschienen: 2011-11-04 00:00:00
ISSN
0016-5751

Zusammenfassung

Objective: to compare efficiency of mifepristone and intracervical prostaglandin E2 gel for cervical ripening and labor induction. Study design: a prospective randomised study. Methods: One hundred and twenty three patients with the singleton term pregnancy (average gestational age 285±4 days), cephalic presentation and Bishop score ≤5 or 6–8 points. The women were randomised to receive either mifepristone 200mg orally twice (with an interval of 24 hours) or intracervical PGE2 gel (0.5mg dinoprostone) with 6 hours intervals (up to three doses) for cervical ripening and labor induction. The criteria of efficiency…

Schlagworte

After Cervix Uteri Dinoprostone Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde