CareLit Fachartikel

Comparison of adhesion prevention efficacy of coated Parietex® and Proceed® meshes versus uncoated polypropylene mesh combined with anti-adhesion device 4DryField® PH in a new IPO…

D Pöhnert, LV Grethe, L Mägel, J Klempnauer, M Winny · Zeitschrift für Gastroenterologie · 2016 · Heft 08

Dokument
1115944
CareLit-ID
Jahr
2016
Publikation
PDF
nein
Metadaten
DOI
ja
zitierfähig

Bibliografische Angaben

Zeitschrift
Zeitschrift für Gastroenterologie
Autor:innen
D Pöhnert, LV Grethe, L Mägel, J Klempnauer, M Winny
Ausgabe
Heft 08 / 2016
Seiten
–
Erschienen: 2016-08-16 00:00:00
ISSN
0044-2771

Zusammenfassung

Introduction: Intestinal adhesions to IPOM meshes are a problem following hernia surgery. In areas where the hernia sac content has been dissolved from the hernia wall, an intact peritoneal coverage is missing and is a location at risk for intestine to IPOM adhesions. Using a new IPOM rat model the role of missing intact peritoneal coverage in the development of intestine to mesh adhesions was investigated. The adhesion prevention capability of the two coated meshes Proceed® (PC) and Parietex® (PT) was compared to uncoated Ultrapro® combined with the adhesion prevention barrier 4DryField® PH (4DF). Furthermore,…

Schlagworte

Abdominal Wall After Zeitschrift für Gastroenterologie