CareLit Fachartikel

Possibilities of standardisation for rapid reviews – proposal for the German Federal Ministry for Education and Research

Buchberger, B.; Kossmann, B.; Krabbe, L.; Mattivi, J. · Das Gesundheitswesen · 2015 · Heft 8/09 · S. 1 bis 1

Dokument
334117
CareLit-ID
Jahr
2015
Publikation
PDF
nein
Metadaten
DOI
ja
zitierfähig

Bibliografische Angaben

Zeitschrift
Das Gesundheitswesen
Autor:innen
Buchberger, B.; Kossmann, B.; Krabbe, L.; Mattivi, J.
Ausgabe
Heft 8/09 / 2015
Jahrgang 77
Seiten
1 bis 1
Erschienen: 2015-09-10 13:00:00
ISSN
0941-3790

Zusammenfassung

Background: Basing on a comparison of systematic reviews and rapid reviews for surgical interventions by using AMSTAR, an instrument for quality assessment, we identified ambiguity concerning the term 'rapid' as well as a need for standardisation. Due to the urgency of some questions, an acceleration of the review process is of high priority. There are many possibilities of methodological restrictions but with weak empirical evidence regarding the consequences like increased potential of bias. Objectives: Our aims are to develop a standardised rapid review methodology, to conduct a rapid review based on that met…

Schlagworte

Gesundheit Pflege Bias Lead Acceleration Das Gesundheitswesen