CareLit Fachartikel

Rapid reviews: Do they really save time and resources?

Mattivi, J.; Buchberger, B. · Das Gesundheitswesen · 2015 · Heft 8/09 · S. 1 bis 1

Dokument
334201
CareLit-ID
Jahr
2015
Publikation
PDF
nein
Metadaten
DOI
ja
zitierfähig

Bibliografische Angaben

Zeitschrift
Das Gesundheitswesen
Autor:innen
Mattivi, J.; Buchberger, B.
Ausgabe
Heft 8/09 / 2015
Jahrgang 77
Seiten
1 bis 1
Erschienen: 2015-09-10 13:00:00
ISSN
0941-3790

Zusammenfassung

Introduction: Conducting full systematic reviews or health technology assessments (HTA) is time-consuming and costly. It usually requires between six months and one year to complete a systematic review, and at least one year to complete a HTA. Caused by the urgency of some questions, information is needed within a shorter timeframe. There are different possibilities to shorten the review process mostly comprising methodological restrictions. Our aim was to test the feasibility of AMSTAR, a tool to assess the quality of systematic reviews, for rapid reviews. Furthermore, we investigated the time needed for a shor…

Schlagworte

Gesundheit Pflege Betrug Das Gesundheitswesen