CareLit Fachartikel

Comparative efficacy and safety of digital and hybrid interventions for the treatment of low back pain: systematic review and Bayesian component network meta-analysis

Kaczorowski, S.; Donath, L.; Owen, P.J.; Arora, N.K.; Saueressig, T.; Pedder, H.; Mundell, N.L.; Schleimer, T.; Döding, R.; Belavy, D.L. · physioscience · 2025 · Heft S 02 · S. 1 bis 1

Dokument
573361
CareLit-ID
Jahr
2025
Publikation
PDF
nein
Metadaten
DOI
ja
zitierfähig

Bibliografische Angaben

Zeitschrift
physioscience
Autor:innen
Kaczorowski, S.; Donath, L.; Owen, P.J.; Arora, N.K.; Saueressig, T.; Pedder, H.; Mundell, N.L.; Schleimer, T.; Döding, R.; Belavy, D.L.
Ausgabe
Heft S 02 / 2025
Jahrgang 21
Seiten
1 bis 1
Erschienen: 2025-11-24 13:00:00
ISSN
1860-3092

Zusammenfassung

Introduction Digital interventions for low back pain (LBP) often combine exercise training, education, and psychological components, delivered either fully digitally or as hybrid models incorporating in-person elements. It is unclear which components and combinations of these drive clinical efficacy. Utilizing a prospectively registered component network meta-analysis (CNMA) we evaluated the efficacy and safety of digital and hybrid interventions for non-specific LBP. Material and Methods We searched six databases and two trial registries, and performed citation tracking from inception to April 11, 2024, to iden…

Schlagworte

Bias Germany physioscience