CareLit Fachartikel

RCTs of complex interventions in mental health care: what works for whom?

B Puschner, M Slade · Psychiatrische Praxis · 2011 · Heft 04

Dokument
924121
CareLit-ID
Jahr
2011
Publikation
PDF
nein
Metadaten
DOI
ja
zitierfähig

Bibliografische Angaben

Zeitschrift
Psychiatrische Praxis
Autor:innen
B Puschner, M Slade
Ausgabe
Heft 04 / 2011
Seiten
–
Erschienen: 2011-04-14 00:00:00
ISSN
0303-4259

Zusammenfassung

„Conventional“ intent-to-treat-analysis merely answers the question „Does it work?“, while process evaluation yields insights into „For whom does it work (best)?“ and „What works?“ Thus, process analysis aims at elucidating why an intervention did or did not work and which subgroups of patients in which settings did or did not benefit from it. Sound analysis of moderators and/or mediators of treatment effect is crucial to inform future applications of results of randomized controlled trials. It is especially important to answer the question whether an intervention was truly ineffective or just poorly delivered.…

Schlagworte

Psychiatrische Praxis